Skip to main content

NUnit in Team Foundation Build

Not everyone have embraced Microsofts testing platform, but prefer to use other tools for unit testing, for instance NUnit. Because this is such a common scenario there is lots of information and components to help with integrating NUnit in Team Foundation Build.

The easiest solution is to use two add-on components. MSBuild Community Tasks to make configuration easier and NUnit for Team Build to integrate the testresults in the build log and get the results in reports. Both of these components are open source and free to download.

Begin with installing NUnit, MSBuild Community Tasks and NUnit for Team Build. After that only some changes in TFSBuild.proj are needet to get a really nice integration of NUnit in Team Foundation Server.

Import MSBuild Community Tasks by adding the following row:

<Import Project="$(MSBuildExtensionsPath)\MSBuildCommunityTasks\MSBuild.Community.Tasks.targets" />

Now we have the possibility to use every task that is defined in the imported file, but the one we are interested in here is only the one that concerns NUnit. To add an NUnit task, add the following at the bottom of TFSBuild.proj:

<Target Name="AfterCompile">
    <!-- Create a Custom Build Step -->
    <BuildStep TeamFoundationServerUrl="$(TeamFoundationServerUrl)" BuildUri="$(BuildUri)" Name="NUnitTestStep" Message="Running Nunit Tests">
        <Output TaskParameter="Id" PropertyName="NUnitStepId" />
    </BuildStep>

    <!-- Get Assemblies to test -->
    <ItemGroup>
        <TestAssemblies Include="$(OutDir)\**\cs-*.dll" />
    </ItemGroup>

    <!-- Run NUnit and check the result -->
    <NUnit ContinueOnError="true" Assemblies="@(TestAssemblies)" OutputXmlFile="$(OutDir)nunit_results.xml" ToolPath="$(ProgramFiles)\Nunit 2.4.7\bin\">
        <Output TaskParameter="ExitCode" PropertyName="NUnitResult" />
    </NUnit>
    <BuildStep Condition="'$(NUnitResult)'=='0'" TeamFoundationServerUrl="$(TeamFoundationServerUrl)" BuildUri="$(BuildUri)" Id="$(NUnitStepId)" Status="Succeeded" />
    <BuildStep Condition="'$(NUnitResult)'!='0'" TeamFoundationServerUrl="$(TeamFoundationServerUrl)" BuildUri="$(BuildUri)" Id="$(NUnitStepId)" Status="Failed" />

    <!-- Regardless of NUnit success/failure upload the results to TFS. -->
    <Exec Command="&quot;$(MSBuildProjectDirectory)\NUnitTFS.exe&quot; -n &quot;$(OutDir)nunit_results.xml&quot; -t &quot;$(TeamProject)&quot; -b &quot;$(BuildNumber)&quot; -f &quot;%(ConfigurationToBuild.FlavorToBuild)&quot; -p &quot;%(ConfigurationToBuild.PlatformToBuild)&quot; -x &quot;$(MSBuildProjectDirectory)\NUnitToMSTest.xslt&quot;" />

    <!-- If NUnit failed it's time to error out -->
    <Error Condition="'$(NUnitResult)'!='0'" Text="Unit Tests Failed" />
</Target>

If you would like to run the test with a specific App.config like a testrunconfig file, it is possible to put the App.config file in the Source Control tree in the same directory as TFSBuild.proj. By running a copy command in the test task the special App.config could be copied with the current build. Add the following row for the concerned test DLL:s before the NUnit step:

<Exec Command="copy &quot;$(MSBuildProjectDirectory)\App.config&quot; &quot;$(OutDir)\MyTest.dll.config&quot; /y" />

Note the /y attribute which means that an existing file will be overwritten automatically.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Programming AD with C#.NET – part 4

Our transition to the  System.DirectoryServices.Protocols  has in the whole gone very smooth, but there have been some issues with one environment that contains subdomains. Most things are working fine, but writing to a subdomain does not work in the same way as it did before. What is generally bad with the  System.DirectoryServices.Protocols is the documentation, which is practically non-existent. But most things can  be figured out anyway since most classes just are wrappers for the wldap32.dll, which in turn is way better documented. I would like to have as little bindings to a specific server as possible but still be able to access the domain. In the  LdapConnection  it is possible to set the identifier to null and use the executing computer as a starting point to find a domain controller. But sometimes I must know that I am using a Global Catalog, and with more and more RODC in the environment I sometimes must know that I am working against a writeable domain controller.
Post a Comment
Read more

jQuery file upload with Bootstrap progress bar

Performing an asynchronous file upload from the browser is a common problem with almost as many solutions as there are developers. The following solution is the best fit for my needs, and also works well with most popular browsers. Backwards compatibility is not an issue in this case which is great, because I can use the new technologies as they are supposed to be used. Everything is put together in JSFiddle for a working example . I will continue to explain the parts below... First, the input field needs to be styled as a button. The form tag is only present for us to be able to reset the file input field later on. <form>     <span class="fileUpload btn btn-default">         <span class="glyphicon glyphicon-upload"></span> Upload file         <input type="file" id="uploadFile" />     </span> </form> .fileUpload { position: relative; overflow: hidden; } .fileUpload input { position: a
Post a Comment
Read more

Google+ finally for everyone!

There have been a lot of whining on Google from their Apps-users since the launch of  Google+  for everyone with a regular Google-account. The Apps-users have not been able to use  Google+ , until now! (actually  october 27 ) As usual I am impressed with most of the things Google accomplishes, but now when all of their services have gotten a visual and functional touchup I am getting really impressed. As someone at an early stage pointed out it is really sweet of Google to play naive and let me fill in my profile information when I create my profile (as if Google did not already know), but after a few clicks I am on the go. My albums from Picasa is automatically integrated and even the pictures I have uploaded to this blog is shown in  Google+ . But what happens next? Practically no one of my friends are on  Google+  so what do I use it for? I guess we will see. Hopefully there will be even more integration between the social networks in the future. I am anyhow very satified with
1 comment
Read more